Name the real competition
When: Competitive analysis lists only products in your category, yet deals are lost to no decision, budgets drain to unrelated purchases, and positioning against the named rivals moves nothing. The category defines the competitor set and the customer plainly does not agree.
The action: Derive the competitor set from switching stories rather than from the category. List everything people actually hire for the job, including workarounds, other budget lines, and doing nothing at all. Position and design against what the customer would genuinely use instead, and let the category list go.
Forces: A category competitor set is legible to analysts, boards, and sales training in a way a job-derived set is not, so the honest list has an internal selling cost. Cross-category competitors cannot be beaten on category features, which invalidates comfortable battlecards. The list is only as good as the stories beneath it.
Signals: Within weeks, win-loss notes record at least one loss to an alternative no category map contains. Positioning changes to answer the real alternative. The phrase "no decision" starts being treated as a named competitor with a cause.
When not to: In genuinely closed procurement categories where the shortlist is fixed by rule and the job lens changes nothing about the decision. When no switching stories exist yet, in which case run the switch interviews first.
Instance: Moesta's candy bar analysis, in which Snickers turned out to be hired like a meal, competing with a sandwich, while Milky Way was hired for emotional recovery, competing with wine and ice cream. Two neighbouring products on the same shelf with almost no competitors in common.
Licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.