Segment by struggling moment
When: Personas built on demographics or firmographics are failing to predict behaviour. The same persona buys enthusiastically in one situation and ignores the product in another. Marketing and product are targeting who the customer is when the variation is driven by the situation the customer is in.
The action: Re-cut the segmentation by circumstance. Group customers by the struggling moment that triggers the job, drawing on real switching stories rather than attribute data. Give each segment a name that describes the situation, not the person. Then check each product decision against a situation, asking which struggling moment it serves.
Forces: Attribute data is cheap and sits in the CRM, while circumstance data must be gathered through interviews and observation. Demographic segments are legible to finance and marketing tooling in a way situational segments are not, so the re-cut has an internal selling cost. The same person occupies different segments at different times, which breaks assumptions built into most targeting machinery.
Signals: Within weeks, segments predict differences in purchase or usage that the demographic cut could not. Messaging written against a struggling moment outperforms messaging written against a persona. Teams start asking "which situation is this for" as a reflex in design reviews.
When not to: When demographics genuinely gate the job, as in regulated, age-restricted, or geography-bound markets where who the customer is determines what they can hire. When there is no behavioural variation to explain, since a re-segmentation exercise without an anomaly is theatre. When the switching stories that would ground the segments have not been gathered, in which case run the switch interviews first.
Instance: Christensen and Moesta's milkshake study, in which morning commuters and afternoon parents bought the same product for different jobs, and segmenting by situation rather than demographic changed what improvement meant.
Licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.